Developing a strategy for SANORD with short-term and long-term objectives
The Southern African-Nordic Centre is currently a partnership of 37 research-led higher education institutions from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and institutions in Botswana, Namibia, Malawi, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
In 2009 the members adopted an Action Plan which is annually updated by the SANORD Central Office (SCO) and the members. This action plan is used to gauge the progress of the SCO and our SANORD members in the current academic year. It primarily addresses the action by the SCO in the current year and should promote the goals in the SANORD Mission statement of 2007.
The following goals form the cornerstone of the SANORD centre:
We must bear in mind that SANORD is a low-budget organisation which depends on the actions by its members and the synergies between them. The actions to be performed by our SANORD members should be emphasised. The SCO, with reference to the action plan, is responsible for liaising with members, stimulating events, maintaining the portal and other work requested by the Board. The Action Plan seeks to give direction to the work by the SCO and to identify expected action by SANORD members.
However, the vision to expand the network from Southern Africa to Sub-Saharan Africa poses new opportunities and challenges. Given the experiences with SANORD till date, this working group should attempt to describe these opportunities and challenges. It should provide its reflections on concepts such as ‘strategic’ and ‘relevant’ and consider whether the above expansion should be accompanied by changes in SANORD’s focus, goals and objectives, keeping both short-term and long-term perspectives in mind.
Developing a plan for ERASMUS-collaboration among SANORD members
ERASMUS FOR ALL is the new EU programme for education, training, youth and sport proposed by the European Commission on 23 November 2011. The proposal is now under discussion by the Council (27 Member States) and the European Parliament who will take the final decision.
Therefore, the future modalities for ERASMUS collaboration between European (Nordic) and African countries are not yet clear. On the basis of the presentation on ERASMUS FOR ALL delivered by an EU representative on Day 1, as well as any other information concerning the programme that is available during the Symposium, this group work will initiate a planning process that aims at facilitating ERASMUS collaboration among SANORD partners.
The work of the group will continue after the Aarhus Symposium. The objective will be to describe and recommend concrete mechanisms for facilitation and enhancement of ERASMUS collaboration and other funding mechanisms that the working group may wish to include in its work. The outcome will be presented at the SANORD conference in Malawi in 2013.
Developing a framework for research collaboration among SANORD members
SANORD is committed to advancing strategic, multilateral academic collaboration between institutions in the two regions, as they seek to address new local and global challenges of innovation and development. SANORD currently operates at two main levels:
Institutional: Bringing together leaders of universities ‘for discussion, planning and joint endeavors’ (strategic and otherwise).
Research Support Structures: Providing brokering services/logistics/information services, support to strategic research project development, cultural exchange, and; builds relationships with non-academic stakeholders (donors, industry, government).
Capacity development in research and tertiary educational institutions is a priority across Africa. Excepting NEPAD, SANORD does not explicitly align itself with any processes or institutional frameworks, yet it aims to attract donor funding for research programmes with capacity building as a more or less explicit objective. Should SANORD be better aligned with national and regional strategies and policies for capacity development?
Reflecting current demand, SANORD predominantly supports research collaboration in the social science and humanities. However, addressing many of the development challenges in SSA, such as climate change, environmental challenges, health and food security challenges calls for more involvement of the natural sciences and for interdisciplinary approaches. How can SANORD better address this challenge?
SANORD’S research support functions have been crucial in getting research projects up and running and are highly valued by researchers. However, do we have systematic information about the quality of assistance, effect and impact in relation to SANORD’s support activities and in relation to the projects that have been supported? Would an improved quality assurance system, perhaps in the shape of a monitoring and evaluation system, contribute to obtaining better knowledge about these issues? This might be particularly pertinent in light of the intention to attract more donor funding and closer alignment with research priorities in the regions.